SVG Foundation

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Charity foundations
  • Charitable gifts
  • Philanthropists
  • Non-profit organizations
  • Charitable Trust Fund

SVG Foundation

Header Banner

SVG Foundation

  • Home
  • Charity foundations
  • Charitable gifts
  • Philanthropists
  • Non-profit organizations
  • Charitable Trust Fund
Charitable gifts
Home›Charitable gifts›CONVERSATIONS WITH KEN & JOE: Tax Code: is it fair or is it to be fixed? | Notice

CONVERSATIONS WITH KEN & JOE: Tax Code: is it fair or is it to be fixed? | Notice

By Gary Edwards
June 26, 2021
0
0

Joe: When you have practiced law for a number of years, every lawyer will have a case or cases that they remember well. One of them stuck with me very early on, when I started practicing law in Chicago. It was a pro bono case. A senior member of the firm asked me to accompany a client who was being audited to an IRS tax hearing. His offense and the reason for the audit was that he was taking care of his mother who was over 80 years old and declaring her dependent.

The position of the IRS was that it was not providing more than 50% of its support. When I got to the hearing, the IRS agent was sitting behind his desk with the client’s file. The client was a single man in his 50s who worked eight hours a day in a factory. He was not a rich person. I immediately asked the IRS agent, “With all the wealthy people using questionable loopholes in the code, you must not mind spending a lot of time auditing this particular taxpayer, right? not ? The woman is his disabled mother. Are there no bigger fish to whip? “

After we gave the officer a detailed account of her mother’s condition and produced receipts, everything was fine. It was my last and only tax case.

Nothing has changed much since that hearing. When you open the tax code’s sewer cover and look into its muddy contents, the biggest beneficiaries are the richest who accumulate great fortunes and yet pay little or no tax. See a June 8 ProPublica article that provides startling details that demolish the myth of the U.S. tax system that everyone pays their fair share and the richest Americans pay the most.

The rich do this through a variety of tax avoidance strategies and wealth-creating loopholes without claiming income on a W-2. In addition, tax rates were cut by the GOP-dominated Senate in 2017, which disproportionately benefited the wealthy. The rich with their lobbyists and donations to members of Congress seem to write the tax rules. The result is that they roll in gobs of dough. With little physical endurance or a need to earn their daily living by working hard in the trenches, many doze off during the day and are oblivious with so little to do except write a check every month on the trunk. campaign of their congressman.

Meanwhile, the vast majority of Americans who live paycheck to paycheck to work for a living pay taxes that range from 10% to about 40%. Do you agree that a fundamental overhaul of the US tax system is needed?

Ken: On the other hand, the US income tax system looks pretty progressive if you look at some of the data for 2020. The richest 1% of taxpayers, around 1.5 million tax filers, paid around 40% of the total. of US tax revenues. The top 50% paid around 90%; the lower half paid 10%. The richest 1% paid an average tax rate of 27%, the bottom half, 4%. What exactly is her fair share, whether rich or poor?

Investment whale Warren Buffett has expressed sadness for paying taxes at a lower rate than some of his employees. The reason is that he does not receive any salary (as indicated by the W-2), but, like many middle-class retirees, his income largely comes from capital gains (reported on Form 1099) which are taxed at 20% rather than the cap. 37% bracket.

As for “loopholes,” they include deductions from income for charitable donations, business expenses, business losses, mortgage interest, and state and municipal taxes. The alternative to listing on a tax return is to take the standard deduction of $ 12,400. Retirement, IRA and 401 (k) accounts are tax-sheltered until the money is withdrawn.

There’s one loophole that has recently come to attention: Hedge fund managers are paid out of the company’s profits, called deferred interest, which is taxed as capital gains. The Biden administration has expressed a desire to remove this one. If you think about it, as a group, the Rifts aren’t sneaky cheaters but serve a purpose, and most are aimed at boosting the economy that benefits everyone. A low rate of capital gains encourages idle dollars to be put at risk while investing. Finally, Congress passed the loopholes, and those same lawmakers can remove them at any time.

Joe: From your answer, it appears that you consider the tax system to be fair and transparent. The GOP Senate seems to be with you. Some have likely been offered a spot on Jeff Bezos’ planned space trip. Currently, the tax code has different tax rates for various sources of income, such as capital gains, dividends, and labor income, giving the rich an economic advantage. If all sources of income were taxed as ordinary income, everyone would be on an equal footing. Given Washington’s political makeup, the likelihood of anything changing is low, as many senators are in the grip of billionaires.

Yet, according to the WSJ, the number of expatriates is on the rise, the cause being the likely change in the tax code. Do they know more than we do? The real problem comes down to money in politics. Mandatory campaign finance reform and the elimination of a lot of black money would let members of Congress work for the people and not for the money, don’t you think?

Ken: First, campaign finance reform is a topic for another day. Second, there are several members of Congress who wouldn’t mind if they were shot in space. Third, let’s get back to taxes. Although Congress seems to have forgotten these days, it is incumbent on lawmakers to exercise some restraint in spending. If the government seems to be going too far by overspending and trying to balance by taxing too much, there are negative consequences. American companies will be packing their bags and moving abroad. People will move – as Governor Pritzker found out – to avoid being bled dry by paying the inordinate spending of the Illinois government; also, ins should remember that this might just be rejected.

Dr Ken Johnston has been an ENT surgeon in Kankakee since 1976. He has served on several community boards and has been involved in clubs and organizations. He has lived in Bourbonnais since 1981. He can be contacted via the Daily Journal at [email protected] or directly at [email protected]

Joe yurgine is a practicing lawyer, “Of Counsel” at Corboy & Demetrio, Chicago. He can be contacted via the Daily Journal at [email protected] or directly at [email protected]

Related posts:

  1. Seymour Class of 1970 Target Agricultural Program
  2. Save the Children UK revenue fell by £ 18million last year
  3. Gifting real estate – ELCA Grand Canyon Synod
  4. Donation from the Merseyside Police Federation to Hoylake Cottage

Categories

  • Charitable gifts
  • Charitable Trust Fund
  • Charity foundations
  • Non-profit organizations
  • Philanthropists

Recent Posts

  • Remember to do your homework before claiming a charitable donation tax deduction | Parkes Champion Post
  • “It’s not unsolvable; There are solutions. How Raikes Supports Fair School Funding and More
  • Country Representative in Yemen / Only Yemeni nationals are eligible
  • Cabinet commends the efforts of government agencies in implementing reforms and improving business performance
  • The Seguin Area Community Foundation shares donations with local nonprofits

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • January 2020
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions